From scandal to safeguard: why governance matters for non-profits

Recent allegations of fraud at well-known institutions have highlighted a critical truth: even prestigious organizations are not immune to governance failures. Non-profits, in particular, face heightened risks due to complex funding structures and reliance on trust. This article was written to underscore why robust governance is essential—not only to prevent fraud and misuse of funds but also to safeguard reputation and ensure long-term sustainability.  

When allegations of fraud shake even the most respected institutions, trust collapses overnight. The recent scandal allegedly involving the College of Europe and potential fraud in the use of EU funds is a stark reminder that no organisation—however prestigious—is immune to governance failures. For non-profits organisations (“NPOs”), the stakes are even higher: reputational damage can cripple fundraising, undermine partnerships, and derail missions built over decades.  

Good governance is not a bureaucratic formality. It is the cornerstone of integrity, accountability, and resilience. In a sector where transparency is paramount and public trust is the lifeblood; robust governance mechanisms are the ultimate safeguard against misconduct and mismanagement.

I. Why governance matters? Beyond compliance: protecting reputation and mission

Governance is often perceived as a legal requirement or a set of burdensome administrative formalities. In reality, it is far more than that—it is the backbone of organisational integrity. For non-profits, where trust is the currency and public confidence underpins every partnership and donation, governance is a strategic defense mechanism.

When governance fails, the consequences are swift and severe. Scandals do not simply result in financial loss; they erode credibility, fracture relationships with stakeholders, and jeopardize the very mission the NPO seeks to achieve. The recent scandals demonstrate how insufficient oversight, and opaque decision-making can lead to reputational crises that linger for years.

Strong governance ensures that decisions are made transparently, resources are managed responsibly, and risks are identified before they escalate. It is not about adding layers of bureaucracy, it is about creating a culture of accountability that protects the NPO’s purpose and the trust of those it serves.

II. The pillars of good governance - Building a framework that works

Effective governance is not improvised; it rests on a solid structure designed to prevent risks and promote accountability. For NPOs, this means embedding clear roles, independent oversight, and ethical safeguards into the NPO’s DNA.

• Independent boards of directors (“BoD”): A diverse BoD with external directors is essential to avoid
• Specialised committees: Audit and ethics committees act as watchdogs for financial integrity and ethical compliance. Their role is to scrutinise budgets, monitor risk, and ensure that policies are not just written but actively enforced.
• Rotation of mandates: Leadership renewal prevents the concentration of power and fosters fresh perspectives. Regular turnover of BoD’s positions and committee chairs is a simple yet powerful way to maintain dynamism and accountability.

These pillars form the foundation of a governance system that is proactive rather than a reactive—one that anticipates risks before they become scandals.

III. Transparency and accountability - Turning the spotlight inward

Transparency is the antidote to suspicion. For NPOs, where public trust is the lifeblood, openness about how decisions are made, and funds are used is non-negotiable.

• Public reporting: Annual financial statements and impact reports should be published and easily accessible. This demonstrates not only compliance but a genuine commitment to accountability.
• External audits: Independent audits provide credibility and reassure donors that resources are managed responsibly. They also serve as an early warning system for irregularities.
• Clear documentation: Every major decision—whether financial or strategic—should be documented and traceable. This creates a culture where accountability is embedded in daily operations, not just in crisis management.

Transparency is not about overwhelming stakeholders with data; it is about providing clear, honest information that builds confidence and deters misconduct.

IV. Checks and balances: preventing power from becoming absolute

Even the most well-intentioned leaders need oversight. Checks and balances ensure that authority is distributed, and decisions are subject to scrutiny—critical safeguards against fraud and mismanagement.

• Separation of roles: Management should focus on operations, while the BoD provides strategic oversight. Blurring these lines creates fertile ground for conflicts of interest.
• Dual authorisation: Significant financial transactions should require two independent approvals. This simple measure dramatically reduces the risk of unilateral decisions and misuse of funds.
• Regular governance reviews: Annual evaluations of governance practices and risk exposure keep systems current and effective. These reviews should involve external perspectives to avoid complacency.

Checks and balances are not about mistrust—they are about building resilience. They create a structure where accountability is shared, and no single individual holds unchecked power.

V. Anti-fraud culture: from policy to practice

Policies alone do not prevent fraud—culture does. NPOs must embed integrity into their daily operations, making ethical behaviour the norm rather than the exception.

• Written policies: Clear anti-fraud and anti-corruption policies set expectations and provide a framework for action. Include specific procurement ethics guidelines to address risks like bid-rigging and collusion. These should be communicated to all staff, volunteers, and partners through training to ensure awareness.
• Whistleblowing channels: Secure, confidential reporting mechanisms empower individuals to speak up without fear of retaliation. Protecting whistleblowers is essential to uncover wrongdoing early.
• Mandatory training: Regular training on ethics, compliance, and risk awareness (including procurement risk) ensures that everyone understands their responsibilities. Education transforms rules into habits.

Creating an anti-fraud culture is not about suspicion, it is about trust. When people know that integrity is valued and protected, they are more likely to uphold it.

VI. Conclusion

Scandals are not inevitable, they are preventable. The recent allegations involving the College of Europe underscore a simple truth: governance is the strongest shield against reputational and financial damage. For NPOs, embedding governance into the NPO’s DNA is not a luxury; it is a necessity.

By combining structural safeguards, transparency, checks and balances, and a culture of integrity, NPOs can protect their mission and maintain the trust of stakeholders, donors, beneficiaries, and the public. Governance is not about bureaucracy, it is about resilience, credibility, and the confidence to pursue purpose without fear of scandal.

Should you have any questions or concerns, Antoine DRUETZ, Partner, and Alix DEGREZ, Counsel will gladly assist your organisation.